MAKSUD ALAM vs State of Bihar Advocate - Jagdish Prasad sah — 340/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 303(2),317(2). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 07th April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRKT010014082026
Filing Number
1213/2026
Filing Date
28-Feb-2026
Registration No
340/2026
Registration Date
28-Feb-2026
Court
DJ Div. Katihar
Judge
10-District and Additional Sessions Judge-IX
Decision Date
07-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
55
Police Station
KATIHAR MUFASSIL
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MAKSUD ALAM
Adv. SHAMBHU NATH SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar Advocate - Jagdish Prasad sah
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-Apr-2026
OrderView PDF
Case Summary: A.B.P. No. 340/2026 Maksud Alam v. State of Bihar (Katihar Court, 07-04-2026) The court granted bail to petitioner Maksud Alam in an illegal mining case. Alam, a tractor owner, was accused under the Bihar Mineral Rules 2019 of transporting illegally mined dust/sand. The court found that Alam had already deposited ₹1,04,248 as penalty to the mining department and lacked prior criminal history, warranting bail. The court imposed conditions including surrendering within 30 days or police arrest, furnishing two sureties of ₹10,000 each, and appearance before the concerned magistrate as required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Apr-2026
Disposed
District and Additional Sessions Judge-IX
-
19-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Sessions Judge-IX
-
18-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Sessions Judge-IX
-
02-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 340/2026
Case Summary: A.B.P. No. 340/2026 Maksud Alam v. State of Bihar (Katihar Court, 07-04-2026) The court granted bail to petitioner Maksud Alam in an illegal mining case. Alam, a tractor owner, was accused under the Bihar Mineral Rules 2019 of transporting illegally mined dust/sand. The court found that Alam had already deposited ₹1,04,248 as penalty to the mining department and lacked prior criminal history, warranting bail. The court imposed conditions including surrendering within 30 days or police arrest, furnishing two sureties of ₹10,000 each, and appearance before the concerned magistrate as required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts