PRAHLAD SHARMA vs State of Bihar Advocate - Jagdish Prasad sah — 228/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),127,115(2),109,351(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 19th March 2026.
Regular Bail
CNR: BRKT010013662026
Filing Number
1173/2026
Filing Date
27-Feb-2026
Registration No
228/2026
Registration Date
27-Feb-2026
Court
DJ Div. Katihar
Judge
10-District and Additional Sessions Judge-IX
Decision Date
19-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 17-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
39
Police Station
Azamnagar
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PRAHLAD SHARMA
Adv. Satyendra Kumar Singh
-
2.RITA DEVI
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar Advocate - Jagdish Prasad sah
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
19-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The Additional Sessions Court, Katihar granted bail to applicants Prahlad Sharma and Geeta Devi in a case registered under IPC sections 126(2), 127, 115(2), 109, 351(2), and 3(5) for allegedly assaulting a victim with weapons. The court found that despite serious allegations, the applicants have no criminal history, injuries are minor in nature, there is pre-existing enmity, and they have been in judicial custody since January 28, 2026, warranting bail on a personal bond of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Mar-2026
Disposed
District and Additional Sessions Judge-IX
-
18-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Sessions Judge-IX
-
16-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
28-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 228/2026
The Additional Sessions Court, Katihar granted bail to applicants Prahlad Sharma and Geeta Devi in a case registered under IPC sections 126(2), 127, 115(2), 109, 351(2), and 3(5) for allegedly assaulting a victim with weapons. The court found that despite serious allegations, the applicants have no criminal history, injuries are minor in nature, there is pre-existing enmity, and they have been in judicial custody since January 28, 2026, warranting bail on a personal bond of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts