FARID vs State of Bihar Advocate - Jagdish Prasad sah — 323/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 87,143. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 13th May 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRKT010013062026
Filing Number
1119/2026
Filing Date
26-Feb-2026
Registration No
323/2026
Registration Date
26-Feb-2026
Court
DJ Div. Katihar
Judge
20-District and Additional Sessions Judge-III-cum-Special Judge Mp/Mla
Decision Date
13-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
31
Police Station
RAUTARA
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.FARID
Adv. Md. Tajammul Haque
-
2.RAHIM
-
3.SANTOSH RISHI
-
4.SHARIF
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar Advocate - Jagdish Prasad sah
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-May-2026
Order
Case Summary: A.B.P. No. 323/2026 Decision: The anticipatory bail petition of accused Rahim, Santosh Rishi, and Sharif was GRANTED. The court allowed bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each, to be executed within four weeks of the order. Key Reasoning: The court found that while the petitioners were named in the FIR for alleged human trafficking offences under BNS sections 87/143 and Immoral Traffic Prevention Act sections 4/5, there was no direct allegation they personally received money from the transaction. The victim was recovered safely without documented physical injury or sexual assault allegations, no recovery of the sale amount, and no independent documentary proof of trafficking. Given the petitioners' clean criminal record, willingness to cooperate, and minimal flight risk, the court granted anticipatory bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-May-2026
Disposed
District and Additional Sessions Judge-III-cum-Special Judge Mp/Mla
-
06-May-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Sessions Judge-III-cum-Special Judge Mp/Mla
-
27-Apr-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Sessions Judge-III-cum-Special Judge Mp/Mla
-
20-Apr-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Sessions Judge-III-cum-Special Judge Mp/Mla
-
08-Apr-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Sessions Judge-III-cum-Special Judge Mp/Mla
-
02-Apr-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Sessions Judge-III-cum-Special Judge Mp/Mla
-
01-Apr-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Sessions Judge-III-cum-Special Judge Mp/Mla
-
19-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Sessions Judge-III-cum-Special Judge Mp/Mla
-
18-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Sessions Judge-III-cum-Special Judge Mp/Mla
-
17-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
27-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 323/2026
Case Summary: A.B.P. No. 323/2026 Decision: The anticipatory bail petition of accused Rahim, Santosh Rishi, and Sharif was GRANTED. The court allowed bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each, to be executed within four weeks of the order. Key Reasoning: The court found that while the petitioners were named in the FIR for alleged human trafficking offences under BNS sections 87/143 and Immoral Traffic Prevention Act sections 4/5, there was no direct allegation they personally received money from the transaction. The victim was recovered safely without documented physical injury or sexual assault allegations, no recovery of the sale amount, and no independent documentary proof of trafficking. Given the petitioners' clean criminal record, willingness to cooperate, and minimal flight risk, the court granted anticipatory bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts