BIDYANAND MANDAL vs State of Bihar Advocate - Jagdish Prasad sah — 312/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),117(1),303(2),351(2),3,352,3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 11th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRKT010012682026
Filing Number
1086/2026
Filing Date
24-Feb-2026
Registration No
312/2026
Registration Date
24-Feb-2026
Court
DJ Div. Katihar
Judge
10-District and Additional Sessions Judge-IX
Decision Date
11-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 17-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
144
Police Station
DANDKHORA
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BIDYANAND MANDAL
Adv. Satya Narayan Mandal
-
2.RATAN KUMAR MANDAL
-
3.RAVI KUMAR MANDAL
-
4.MAJULA DEVI
-
5.CHANDANI DEVI
-
6.HEERA LAL MANDAL
-
7.SHARITA DEVI
-
8.RESHMA KUMARI
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar Advocate - Jagdish Prasad sah
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Case Summary Court Decision: The Additional Sessions Judge, Katihar granted anticipatory bail to the applicants (Bidyanand Mandal and seven others) in FIR No. 144/2025 under IPC sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(1), 303(2), 351(2), 352, and 353(5). The court found that both parties had settled their dispute through an amicable compromise mediated by village elders, and the applicants had no criminal history except for three of them. The applicants were ordered to furnish bail bonds of ₹10,000 with two sureties of equal amount and appear before the court within four weeks, failing which they would be arrested. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Disposed
District and Additional Sessions Judge-IX
-
10-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Sessions Judge-IX
-
26-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Sessions Judge-IX
-
25-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 312/2026
Case Summary Court Decision: The Additional Sessions Judge, Katihar granted anticipatory bail to the applicants (Bidyanand Mandal and seven others) in FIR No. 144/2025 under IPC sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(1), 303(2), 351(2), 352, and 353(5). The court found that both parties had settled their dispute through an amicable compromise mediated by village elders, and the applicants had no criminal history except for three of them. The applicants were ordered to furnish bail bonds of ₹10,000 with two sureties of equal amount and appear before the court within four weeks, failing which they would be arrested. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts