ROHIT KUMAR SINGH URF RAJA vs State of Bihar Advocate - Jagdish Prasad sah — 155/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),308(2),351(2),(3),3/5. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 19th March 2026.
Regular Bail
CNR: BRKT010010142026
Filing Number
873/2026
Filing Date
12-Feb-2026
Registration No
155/2026
Registration Date
12-Feb-2026
Court
DJ Div. Katihar
Judge
10-District and Additional Sessions Judge-IX
Decision Date
19-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 17-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
92
Police Station
ROSHNA
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ROHIT KUMAR SINGH URF RAJA
Adv. ALOK RANJAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar Advocate - Jagdish Prasad sah
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
19-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Case Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Katihar granted bail to Rohit Kumar Singh @ Raja in a case involving allegations of extortion and criminal intimidation (IPC Sections 126(2), 115(2), 308(2), 351(2), 351(3), and 3(5)). The court accepted the bail application dated 12-02-2026, noting that both parties had reached a settlement, there was no risk of flight, and the accused was a local resident. Bail was granted on execution of a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, in accordance with CrPC provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Mar-2026
Disposed
District and Additional Sessions Judge-IX
-
11-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Sessions Judge-IX
-
27-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Sessions Judge-IX
-
16-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Sessions Judge-IX
-
13-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 155/2026
Case Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Katihar granted bail to Rohit Kumar Singh @ Raja in a case involving allegations of extortion and criminal intimidation (IPC Sections 126(2), 115(2), 308(2), 351(2), 351(3), and 3(5)). The court accepted the bail application dated 12-02-2026, noting that both parties had reached a settlement, there was no risk of flight, and the accused was a local resident. Bail was granted on execution of a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, in accordance with CrPC provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts