DUKHAN MANDAL vs State of Bihar Advocate - Jagdish Prasad sah — 211/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 80/3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 21st April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRKT010009512026
Filing Number
816/2026
Filing Date
10-Feb-2026
Registration No
211/2026
Registration Date
10-Feb-2026
Court
DJ Div. Katihar
Judge
20-District and Additional Sessions Judge-III-cum-Special Judge Mp/Mla
Decision Date
21-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Last updated 17-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
114
Police Station
POTHIYA
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DUKHAN MANDAL
Adv. lalan kumar jha
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar Advocate - Jagdish Prasad sah
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
21-Apr-2026
OrderView PDF
The District & Additional Sessions Judge-III, Katihar rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Dukhan Mandal, who was accused of torturing and killing his daughter-in-law (Guddi Kumari) along with others in a dowry-related case. The court found the allegations serious in nature, noted the investigation was still pending, and determined that the gravity of the offences (under BNS Sections 80 and 3(5)) warranted denial of anticipatory bail at that stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
21-Apr-2026
Disposed
District and Additional Sessions Judge-III-cum-Special Judge Mp/Mla
-
18-Apr-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Sessions Judge-III-cum-Special Judge Mp/Mla
-
08-Apr-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Sessions Judge-III-cum-Special Judge Mp/Mla
-
07-Apr-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Sessions Judge-III-cum-Special Judge Mp/Mla
-
25-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
25-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
11-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 211/2026
The District & Additional Sessions Judge-III, Katihar rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Dukhan Mandal, who was accused of torturing and killing his daughter-in-law (Guddi Kumari) along with others in a dowry-related case. The court found the allegations serious in nature, noted the investigation was still pending, and determined that the gravity of the offences (under BNS Sections 80 and 3(5)) warranted denial of anticipatory bail at that stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts