State of Bihar vs Mahendra Prajapati — 221/2018
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147,149,341,323,448,504,506. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 27th April 2026.
Sc/st
CNR: BRKM010056012018
Filing Number
4405/2018
Filing Date
17-12-2018
Registration No
221/2018
Registration Date
17-12-2018
Court
DJ Div. Bhabhua
Judge
3-District and Addl Sess Judge 1
Decision Date
27th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
74
Police Station
SC/ST Bhabua PS
Year
2018
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Bihar
Adv. spp
Respondent(s)
Mahendra Prajapati
Amit Prajapati
Awdhesh Prajapati
Hari Narayan Prajapati
Ravi Prajawati
Hearing History
Judge: 3-District and Addl Sess Judge 1
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 21-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 18-04-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 17-04-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 16-04-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Bihar v. Mahendra Prajapati and Others (Case 221/2018) The court acquitted all six accused (Mahendra Prajapati, Amit Prajapati, Awdhesh Prajapati, Ravi Prajapati, Banarsi Prajapati, and Hari Narayan Prajapati) of charges under IPC Sections 447, 323, 341, 354, 504, 506, and SC/ST Act Section 3(1)(s)-(w), finding that the prosecution failed to prove the allegations of assault and caste-based atrocity beyond reasonable doubt due to significant contradictions in witness testimony and insufficient evidence regarding the incident's location and circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: State of Bihar v. Mahendra Prajapati and Others (Case 221/2018) The court acquitted all six accused (Mahendra Prajapati, Amit Prajapati, Awdhesh Prajapati, Ravi Prajapati, Banarsi Prajapati, and Hari Narayan Prajapati) of charges under IPC Sections 447, 323, 341, 354, 504, 506, and SC/ST Act Section 3(1)(s)-(w), finding that the prosecution failed to prove the allegations of assault and caste-based atrocity beyond reasonable doubt due to significant contradictions in witness testimony and insufficient evidence regarding the incident's location and circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts