Sudama Ram vs State of Bihar — 534/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),126(2),351(2),351(3),352,3(5),74. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 29th April 2026.
A B P - Anticipatoty Bail
CNR: BRKM010025182026
e-Filing Number
24-03-2026
Filing Number
2285/2026
Filing Date
24-Mar-2026
Registration No
534/2026
Registration Date
24-Mar-2026
Court
DJ Div. Bhabhua
Judge
1-Principal Distt and Sess Judge
Decision Date
29-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 06-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
56
Police Station
RAMGARH
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sudama Ram
Adv. Gopal Tiwari
-
2.Anuj Kumar alias Anuj Ram
Adv. Gopal Tiwari
-
3.Babulal Ram
Adv. Gopal Tiwari
-
4.Antim Kumar alias Antim Ram
Adv. Gopal Tiwari
-
5.Madan Ram
Adv. Gopal Tiwari
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
29-Apr-2026
Copy of orderView PDF
Case Summary: ABP No. 534/2026 The Sessions Judge at Kaimur granted anticipatory bail to five petitioners (Sudama Ram, Anuj Kumar, Babulal Ram, Antim Kumar, and Madan Ram) charged under BNS sections 115(2), 126(2), 351(2), 351(3), 352, 3(5), and 74. The court found that while allegations involved a village dispute where the accused allegedly beat women with weapons causing simple injuries, the charges lacked specific overt acts, the accused had no criminal history, and most charges were bailable. The petitioners were released on Rs. 10,000 bail bonds with two sureties each upon arrest/surrender within two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
29-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal Distt and Sess Judge
-
20-Apr-2026
Hearing
Principal Distt and Sess Judge
-
07-Apr-2026
Hearing
Principal Distt and Sess Judge
-
25-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 534/2026
Case Summary: ABP No. 534/2026 The Sessions Judge at Kaimur granted anticipatory bail to five petitioners (Sudama Ram, Anuj Kumar, Babulal Ram, Antim Kumar, and Madan Ram) charged under BNS sections 115(2), 126(2), 351(2), 351(3), 352, 3(5), and 74. The court found that while allegations involved a village dispute where the accused allegedly beat women with weapons causing simple injuries, the charges lacked specific overt acts, the accused had no criminal history, and most charges were bailable. The petitioners were released on Rs. 10,000 bail bonds with two sureties each upon arrest/surrender within two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts