Radha Sharma vs State of Bihar — 524/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),126(2),89,85,351(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 21st April 2026.

Case disposed

A B P - Anticipatoty Bail

CNR: BRKM010025012026

Filing Number

2270/2026

Filing Date

24-Mar-2026

Registration No

524/2026

Registration Date

24-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Bhabhua

Judge

29-District and Addl Sess Judge 9

Decision Date

21-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 06-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

2

Police Station

Mahila PS Bhabua

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),126(2),89,85,351(2),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Radha Sharma

    Adv. Chandra Shekhar Sukla

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 21-Apr-2026

    Copy of orderView PDF

    The court granted anticipatory bail to Radha Sharma in a case involving alleged dowry harassment, torture, and illicit relationship charges under BNS sections 115(2), 126(2), 89, 85, 351(2), and 3(5). The judge found no specific allegations directly against the petitioner (who was allegedly involved in an illicit relationship with the informant's husband) and noted her lack of criminal antecedent, directing her release on bail of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties upon arrest or surrender within four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 21-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District and Addl Sess Judge 9

  4. 18-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl Sess Judge 9

  5. 10-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl Sess Judge 9

  6. 26-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl Sess Judge 9

  7. 25-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 24-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 524/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted anticipatory bail to Radha Sharma in a case involving alleged dowry harassment, torture, and illicit relationship charges under BNS sections 115(2), 126(2), 89, 85, 351(2), and 3(5). The judge found no specific allegations directly against the petitioner (who was allegedly involved in an illicit relationship with the informant's husband) and noted her lack of criminal antecedent, directing her release on bail of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties upon arrest or surrender within four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case