Satyendra Bind vs State of Bihar — 155/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(1),126(2),117(1),109(1),85,352,351(2). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 16th April 2026.
B P - Regular Bail
CNR: BRKM010024992026
e-Filing Number
23-03-2026
Filing Number
2268/2026
Filing Date
24-Mar-2026
Registration No
155/2026
Registration Date
24-Mar-2026
Court
DJ Div. Bhabhua
Judge
1-Principal Distt and Sess Judge
Decision Date
16-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 06-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
69
Police Station
KUDRA
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Satyendra Bind
Adv. Sanjay Kumar Tiwari I
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Apr-2026
Copy of orderView PDF
Case Summary: Satyendra Bind v. State of Bihar (155/2026) The Sessions Court at Kaimur granted bail to Satyendra Bind, accused of dowry harassment and domestic violence against his wife. The court noted it was a matrimonial dispute, that the informant appeared in court stating she had no grievance and was willing to reconcile, and that the petitioner had no criminal history and had spent over seven weeks in judicial custody. Bail was granted on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal Distt and Sess Judge
-
13-Apr-2026
Hearing
Principal Distt and Sess Judge
-
04-Apr-2026
Hearing
Principal Distt and Sess Judge
-
25-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 155/2026
Case Summary: Satyendra Bind v. State of Bihar (155/2026) The Sessions Court at Kaimur granted bail to Satyendra Bind, accused of dowry harassment and domestic violence against his wife. The court noted it was a matrimonial dispute, that the informant appeared in court stating she had no grievance and was willing to reconcile, and that the petitioner had no criminal history and had spent over seven weeks in judicial custody. Bail was granted on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts