Stendra Bind vs State of Bihar — 476/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),109,3(5). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED AS NON-MAINTAINABLE on 26th March 2026.

Case disposed

A B P - Anticipatoty Bail

CNR: BRKM010022732026

Filing Number

2060/2026

Filing Date

17-Mar-2026

Registration No

476/2026

Registration Date

17-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Bhabhua

Judge

3-District and Addl Sess Judge 1

Decision Date

26-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED AS NON-MAINTAINABLE

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

220

Police Station

BHABHUA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),109,3(5)
Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Section 3(1)r,3(1)s

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Stendra Bind

    Adv. Ghanshyam Ram

  2. 2.Sonu BInd

  3. 3.Rahul Bind

  4. 4.Dhanu Bind @ Tej Bahadur Bind

  5. 5.Bhulai Bind

  6. 6.Meghu Bind @ Surendra Bind

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 26-Mar-2026

    Copy of orderView PDF

    The court dismissed the anticipatory bail petition of Satendra Bind and three others, who were charged under BNS sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 3(5) and the SC/ST Act for causing injuries to three persons. The court found that case diary witnesses corroborated the FIR allegations and documented multiple lacerated wounds and abrasions on the victims, making it impossible to conclude prima facie that no SC/ST Act offense occurred. Additionally, the court held that anticipatory bail was statutorily barred under Section 18 of the SC/ST Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Addl Sess Judge 1

  4. 19-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl Sess Judge 1

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 17-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 476/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the anticipatory bail petition of Satendra Bind and three others, who were charged under BNS sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 3(5) and the SC/ST Act for causing injuries to three persons. The court found that case diary witnesses corroborated the FIR allegations and documented multiple lacerated wounds and abrasions on the victims, making it impossible to conclude prima facie that no SC/ST Act offense occurred. Additionally, the court held that anticipatory bail was statutorily barred under Section 18 of the SC/ST Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case