Priyaka Kumari vs State of Bihar — 473/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),126(2),351(2),352,65(1),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 17th April 2026.
A B P - Anticipatoty Bail
CNR: BRKM010022712026
Filing Number
2059/2026
Filing Date
17-Mar-2026
Registration No
473/2026
Registration Date
17-Mar-2026
Court
DJ Div. Bhabhua
Judge
24-District and Addl Sess Judge 6
Decision Date
17-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
21
Police Station
Mahila PS Bhabua
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Priyaka Kumari
Adv. Shambhu Kumar
-
2.Akansha Kumari
-
3.Suhani Kumari
-
4.Renu Devi
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Apr-2026
Copy of orderView PDF
Case Summary: 473/2026 The court approved the anticipatory bail application of Priyaka Kumari, Akansha Kumari, Suhani Kumari, and Renu Devi in a Women's Police Station case involving charges under IPC sections 126(2), 115(2), 351(2), 352, 65(1), 3(5) and POCSO Act sections 4, 6. The court found no credible evidence in the investigation record supporting allegations that the petitioners threatened or abused the victim; neither the victim nor any witness corroborated the complainant's claims about a January 22, 2026 incident. Accordingly, the court granted bail with conditions including a bond of ₹15,000, two sureties of equal value, and appearance before the court within 60 days or police surrender. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Apr-2026
Disposed
District and Addl Sess Judge 6
-
04-Apr-2026
Hearing
District and Addl Sess Judge 6
-
03-Apr-2026
Hearing
District and Addl Sess Judge 6
-
19-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Addl Sess Judge 6
-
18-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 473/2026
Case Summary: 473/2026 The court approved the anticipatory bail application of Priyaka Kumari, Akansha Kumari, Suhani Kumari, and Renu Devi in a Women's Police Station case involving charges under IPC sections 126(2), 115(2), 351(2), 352, 65(1), 3(5) and POCSO Act sections 4, 6. The court found no credible evidence in the investigation record supporting allegations that the petitioners threatened or abused the victim; neither the victim nor any witness corroborated the complainant's claims about a January 22, 2026 incident. Accordingly, the court granted bail with conditions including a bond of ₹15,000, two sureties of equal value, and appearance before the court within 60 days or police surrender. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts