Krishna Kumar vs State of Bihar — 472/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),126(2),351(2),352,65(1),3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 17th April 2026.
A B P - Anticipatoty Bail
CNR: BRKM010022702026
Filing Number
2058/2026
Filing Date
17-Mar-2026
Registration No
472/2026
Registration Date
17-Mar-2026
Court
DJ Div. Bhabhua
Judge
24-District and Addl Sess Judge 6
Decision Date
17-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
21
Police Station
Mahila PS Bhabua
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Krishna Kumar
Adv. Shambhu Kumar
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Apr-2026
Copy of order
Summary of Case 472/2026: Krishna Kumar v. State of Bihar Court Decision: The court rejected Krishna Kumar's interim bail application under the POCSO Act (Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act). The petitioner was accused of child sexual abuse involving a 15-year-old girl. Key Reasoning: The court found the allegations serious and credible based on the victim's detailed statements under Sections 180 and 183 IPC, which described a two-year relationship involving coercion, false marriage promises, and sexual exploitation. The court determined that releasing the accused on bail would jeopardize witness safety and the investigation, given the gravity of charges under IPC Sections 126(2), 115(2), 351(2), 352, 65(1), 3(5), and POCSO Sections 4 and 6. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Apr-2026
Disposed
District and Addl Sess Judge 6
-
04-Apr-2026
Hearing
District and Addl Sess Judge 6
-
03-Apr-2026
Hearing
District and Addl Sess Judge 6
-
19-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Addl Sess Judge 6
-
18-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 472/2026
Summary of Case 472/2026: Krishna Kumar v. State of Bihar Court Decision: The court rejected Krishna Kumar's interim bail application under the POCSO Act (Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act). The petitioner was accused of child sexual abuse involving a 15-year-old girl. Key Reasoning: The court found the allegations serious and credible based on the victim's detailed statements under Sections 180 and 183 IPC, which described a two-year relationship involving coercion, false marriage promises, and sexual exploitation. The court determined that releasing the accused on bail would jeopardize witness safety and the investigation, given the gravity of charges under IPC Sections 126(2), 115(2), 351(2), 352, 65(1), 3(5), and POCSO Sections 4 and 6. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts