Nagendra Yadav alias Nagendra Singh Yadav vs State of Bihar — 460/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),191(3),190,126(2),115(2),109,352,351(2). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED AS NON-MAINTAINABLE on 18th April 2026.
A B P - Anticipatoty Bail
CNR: BRKM010021742026
Filing Number
1973/2026
Filing Date
16-Mar-2026
Registration No
460/2026
Registration Date
16-Mar-2026
Court
DJ Div. Bhabhua
Judge
3-District and Addl Sess Judge 1
Decision Date
18-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED AS NON-MAINTAINABLE
Last updated 06-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
200
Police Station
BHABHUA
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Nagendra Yadav alias Nagendra Singh Yadav
Adv. Ghanshyam Kumar
-
2.Rajan Yadav alias Rajan Kumar Yadav
-
3.Ravi Yadav alias Ravi Kumar Yadav
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Apr-2026
Copy of orderView PDF
The court dismissed the anticipatory bail petition filed by Nagendra Yadav, Rajan Yadav, and Ravi Yadav in connection with Case No. 200/2026 under SC/ST Act and BNS provisions. The court found that the victim suffered grievous injuries and the petitioners had prior criminal antecedents; since the victim's caste was known to the accused and earlier SC/ST cases were registered, offences under the SC/ST Act could not be ruled out, making the petition unmaintainable under Section 18 of the SC/ST Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Apr-2026
Disposed
District and Addl Sess Judge 1
-
17-Apr-2026
Hearing
District and Addl Sess Judge 1
-
16-Apr-2026
Hearing
District and Addl Sess Judge 1
-
09-Apr-2026
Hearing
District and Addl Sess Judge 1
-
02-Apr-2026
Hearing
District and Addl Sess Judge 1
-
25-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Addl Sess Judge 1
-
18-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Addl Sess Judge 1
-
17-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 460/2026
The court dismissed the anticipatory bail petition filed by Nagendra Yadav, Rajan Yadav, and Ravi Yadav in connection with Case No. 200/2026 under SC/ST Act and BNS provisions. The court found that the victim suffered grievous injuries and the petitioners had prior criminal antecedents; since the victim's caste was known to the accused and earlier SC/ST cases were registered, offences under the SC/ST Act could not be ruled out, making the petition unmaintainable under Section 18 of the SC/ST Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts