Gabbar Singh Kushwaha alias Dharmendra Singh vs State of Bihar — 446/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),118(1),109(1),352,351(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED AS NON-MAINTAINABLE on 04th April 2026.
A B P - Anticipatoty Bail
CNR: BRKM010021002026
e-Filing Number
13-03-2026
Filing Number
1905/2026
Filing Date
13-Mar-2026
Registration No
446/2026
Registration Date
13-Mar-2026
Court
DJ Div. Bhabhua
Judge
3-District and Addl Sess Judge 1
Decision Date
04-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED AS NON-MAINTAINABLE
Last updated 06-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
48
Police Station
CHAND
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Gabbar Singh Kushwaha alias Dharmendra Singh
Adv. Gopal Tiwari
-
2.Prabhat Kushwaha alias Prabhat Singh
Adv. Gopal Tiwari
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-Apr-2026
Copy of orderView PDF
Case Summary: 446/2026 The court dismissed the anticipatory bail application of Gabbar Singh Kushwaha and Prabhat Kushwaha in a case involving charges under BNS sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109(1), 352, 351(2), 3(5) and SC/ST Act provisions. The court found that prima facie evidence of SC/ST Act violations existed—including six injured persons with injuries documented by a doctor—making anticipatory bail unmaintainable under Section 18 of the SC/ST Act, despite most injuries being simple in nature and investigation remaining pending. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-Apr-2026
Disposed
District and Addl Sess Judge 1
-
25-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Addl Sess Judge 1
-
18-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Addl Sess Judge 1
-
17-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Addl Sess Judge 1
-
16-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 446/2026
Case Summary: 446/2026 The court dismissed the anticipatory bail application of Gabbar Singh Kushwaha and Prabhat Kushwaha in a case involving charges under BNS sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109(1), 352, 351(2), 3(5) and SC/ST Act provisions. The court found that prima facie evidence of SC/ST Act violations existed—including six injured persons with injuries documented by a doctor—making anticipatory bail unmaintainable under Section 18 of the SC/ST Act, despite most injuries being simple in nature and investigation remaining pending. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts