Sarwan Ram alias Shrawan Ram vs State of Bihar — 127/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),74,109,352,351(3),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

B P - Regular Bail

CNR: BRKM010020042026

e-Filing Number

11-03-2026

Filing Number

1815/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

127/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Bhabhua

Judge

1-Principal Distt and Sess Judge

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 27-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

127

Police Station

MOHANIA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),74,109,352,351(3),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sarwan Ram alias Shrawan Ram

    Adv. Ajit Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Copy of orderView PDF

    Case Summary: BP No. 127/2026 The Sessions Judge at Kaimur granted bail to Sarwan Ram (age 29), who was arrested under BNS sections including 126(2), 115(2), 74, 109, 352, and 351(3) for allegedly assaulting an informant and her family members on 21.02.2026. The court considered that the injuries were simple in nature caused by blunt force, the petitioner had no criminal record, custody period had been served, and a cross-case was filed by the petitioner's wife, indicating a mutual quarrel rather than a one-sided assault. Bail was granted on furnishing Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Distt and Sess Judge

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal Distt and Sess Judge

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 127/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: BP No. 127/2026 The Sessions Judge at Kaimur granted bail to Sarwan Ram (age 29), who was arrested under BNS sections including 126(2), 115(2), 74, 109, 352, and 351(3) for allegedly assaulting an informant and her family members on 21.02.2026. The court considered that the injuries were simple in nature caused by blunt force, the petitioner had no criminal record, custody period had been served, and a cross-case was filed by the petitioner's wife, indicating a mutual quarrel rather than a one-sided assault. Bail was granted on furnishing Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case