State of Bihar vs Shiv pujan Pandey — 178/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147,148,149,341,323,307,504. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

Sess. Case - SESSIONS CASE

CNR: BRKM010016112022

Filing Number

1267/2022

Filing Date

12-Apr-2022

Registration No

178/2022

Registration Date

09-May-2022

Court

DJ Div. Bhabhua

Judge

5-District and Addl Sess Judge 3

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 06-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

164

Police Station

CHAND

Year

2016

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 147,148,149,341,323,307,504

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

    Adv. pp

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Shiv pujan Pandey

  2. 2.Rajesh Pandey @ Bagad

  3. 3.Chulbul Pandey

  4. 4.Sushma Kuer

  5. 5.Kalindi Devi

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: State of Bihar v. Shiv Pujan Pandey & Others (178/2022) The court acquitted all four accused persons (Shiv Pujan Pandey, Chulbul Pandey, Rajesh Pandey, and Sushma Kunwar) of charges under IPC sections 147, 148, 341, 323, and 307/149 relating to an alleged violent assault on 15.10.2016. The court found that prosecution witnesses—the informant and an injured witness—both testified they could not identify who specifically committed the assaults due to a large crowd present, making it impossible to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Accordingly, all accused were discharged and released from bail bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Addl Sess Judge 3

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    District and Addl Sess Judge 3

  5. 19-Feb-2026

    Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.

    District and Addl Sess Judge 3

  6. 12-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    District and Addl Sess Judge 3

  7. 15-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    District and Addl Sess Judge 3

  8. 20-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    District and Addl Sess Judge 3

  9. 28-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    District and Addl Sess Judge 3

  10. 06-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    District and Addl Sess Judge 3

  11. 23-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    District and Addl Sess Judge 3

  12. 27-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    District and Addl Sess Judge 3

  13. 04-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    District and Addl Sess Judge 3

  14. 19-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    District and Addl Sess Judge 3

  15. 23-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    District and Addl Sess Judge 3

  16. 01-Nov-2023

    Evidence

    District and Addl Sess Judge 3

  17. 29-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    District and Addl Sess Judge 3

  18. 27-Jun-2023

    Evidence

    District and Addl Sess Judge 3

  19. 20-May-2023

    Evidence

    District and Addl Sess Judge 3

  20. 25-Apr-2023

    Copy of orderView PDF

  21. 25-Apr-2023

    Evidence

    District and Addl Sess Judge 3

  22. 15-Apr-2023

    Charge

    District and Addl Sess Judge 3

  23. 06-Apr-2023

    Order

    District and Addl Sess Judge 3

  24. 04-Mar-2023

    Charge

    District and Addl Sess Judge 3

  25. 20-Feb-2023

    Charge

    District and Addl Sess Judge 3

  26. 16-Dec-2022

    Appearance

    District and Addl Sess Judge 3

  27. 19-Oct-2022

    Appearance

    District and Addl Sess Judge 3

  28. 24-Aug-2022

    Appearance

    District and Addl Sess Judge 3

  29. 22-Jul-2022

    Appearance

    District and Addl Sess Judge 3

  30. 01-Jul-2022

    Charge

    District and Addl Sess Judge 3

  31. 07-Jun-2022

    Charge

    District and Addl Sess Judge 3

  32. 12-May-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  33. 12-Apr-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 178/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Bihar v. Shiv Pujan Pandey & Others (178/2022) The court acquitted all four accused persons (Shiv Pujan Pandey, Chulbul Pandey, Rajesh Pandey, and Sushma Kunwar) of charges under IPC sections 147, 148, 341, 323, and 307/149 relating to an alleged violent assault on 15.10.2016. The court found that prosecution witnesses—the informant and an injured witness—both testified they could not identify who specifically committed the assaults due to a large crowd present, making it impossible to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Accordingly, all accused were discharged and released from bail bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case