Mthailu Rai alias Vikash Rai vs State of Bihar — 365/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),117(2),109(1),352,351(2),351(3),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

A B P - Anticipatoty Bail

CNR: BRKM010015682026

e-Filing Number

25-02-2026

Filing Number

1409/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

365/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Bhabhua

Judge

1-Principal Distt and Sess Judge

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 27-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

12

Police Station

KUDHNI

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),117(2),109(1),352,351(2),351(3),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mthailu Rai alias Vikash Rai

    Adv. Ashok Kumar Rai

  2. 2.Rahul Rai alias Rahul Kumar

    Adv. Ashok Kumar Rai

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Copy of orderView PDF

    Case Summary: ABP No. 365/2026 The Sessions Judge at Kaimur granted anticipatory bail to Mthailu Rai and Rahul Rai, accused of assaulting an informant on 18.02.2026. The court found the injuries were simple contusions caused by blunt objects, no criminal antecedents existed, and evidence suggested the complaint may have been lodged in retaliation for a prior theft case. The petitioners were released on Rs. 10,000 bail bonds with two sureties each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Distt and Sess Judge

  4. 04-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    Principal Distt and Sess Judge

  5. 23-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal Distt and Sess Judge

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal Distt and Sess Judge

  7. 26-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 365/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: ABP No. 365/2026 The Sessions Judge at Kaimur granted anticipatory bail to Mthailu Rai and Rahul Rai, accused of assaulting an informant on 18.02.2026. The court found the injuries were simple contusions caused by blunt objects, no criminal antecedents existed, and evidence suggested the complaint may have been lodged in retaliation for a prior theft case. The petitioners were released on Rs. 10,000 bail bonds with two sureties each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case