Priti Kumar alias Santoshi Kumari vs State of Bihar — 352/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),85,352,351(2). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th April 2026.
A B P - Anticipatoty Bail
CNR: BRKM010014942026
e-Filing Number
24-02-2026
Filing Number
1342/2026
Filing Date
24-Feb-2026
Registration No
352/2026
Registration Date
24-Feb-2026
Court
DJ Div. Bhabhua
Judge
1-Principal Distt and Sess Judge
Decision Date
10-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
35
Police Station
CHAINPUR
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Priti Kumar alias Santoshi Kumari
Adv. Dilip Kumar I
-
2.Putul Devi
Adv. Dilip Kumar I
-
3.Durga Kumari
Adv. Dilip Kumar I
-
4.Sanni Kumar
Adv. Dilip Kumar I
-
5.Kajal Kumari
Adv. Dilip Kumar I
-
6.Rani Kumari
Adv. Dilip Kumar I
-
7.Surendra Seth
Adv. Dilip Kumar I
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Apr-2026
Copy of orderView PDF
The Sessions Judge allowed the anticipatory bail petition filed by seven family members (parents and unmarried sisters of the husband) accused of harassment and torture in a matrimonial dispute case. The court found the allegations against the petitioners to be general and vague, noted their lack of criminal antecedents, and granted bail with a bond of Rs. 10,000 and two sureties of equal amount each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal Distt and Sess Judge
-
04-Apr-2026
Hearing
Principal Distt and Sess Judge
-
19-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal Distt and Sess Judge
-
18-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal Distt and Sess Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal Distt and Sess Judge
-
25-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 352/2026
The Sessions Judge allowed the anticipatory bail petition filed by seven family members (parents and unmarried sisters of the husband) accused of harassment and torture in a matrimonial dispute case. The court found the allegations against the petitioners to be general and vague, noted their lack of criminal antecedents, and granted bail with a bond of Rs. 10,000 and two sureties of equal amount each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts