Mohit Yadav vs State of Bihar — 98/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 306,318(4). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 26th March 2026.
B P - Regular Bail
CNR: BRKM010014072026
e-Filing Number
21-02-2026
Filing Number
1262/2026
Filing Date
21-Feb-2026
Registration No
98/2026
Registration Date
21-Feb-2026
Court
DJ Div. Bhabhua
Judge
1-Principal Distt and Sess Judge
Decision Date
26-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
403
Police Station
BHABHUA
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Mohit Yadav
Adv. Prahlad Singh
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
26-Mar-2026
Copy of orderView PDF
Case Summary: Mohit Yadav v/s State of Bihar (BP No. 98/2026) The Sessions Judge granted bail to Mohit Yadav, accused of taking a harvester from the informant on 02.03.2025 and not returning it (charges under BNS sections 306, 318(4)). The court found that while the harvester was recovered from petitioner's possession, no evidence was recovered despite police remand, he has no criminal antecedent, and he has remained in judicial custody for over two months without chargesheet being filed. The petitioner was released on Rs. 10,000 bail bond with two sureties of equal amount each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
26-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal Distt and Sess Judge
-
25-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal Distt and Sess Judge
-
24-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal Distt and Sess Judge
-
19-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal Distt and Sess Judge
-
18-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal Distt and Sess Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal Distt and Sess Judge
-
27-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal Distt and Sess Judge
-
23-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 98/2026
Case Summary: Mohit Yadav v/s State of Bihar (BP No. 98/2026) The Sessions Judge granted bail to Mohit Yadav, accused of taking a harvester from the informant on 02.03.2025 and not returning it (charges under BNS sections 306, 318(4)). The court found that while the harvester was recovered from petitioner's possession, no evidence was recovered despite police remand, he has no criminal antecedent, and he has remained in judicial custody for over two months without chargesheet being filed. The petitioner was released on Rs. 10,000 bail bond with two sureties of equal amount each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts