Chandrama Ram vs State of Bihar — 200/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103(1),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

A B P - Anticipatoty Bail

CNR: BRKM010007542026

Filing Number

682/2026

Filing Date

30-Jan-2026

Registration No

200/2026

Registration Date

30-Jan-2026

Court

DJ Div. Bhabhua

Judge

1-Principal Distt and Sess Judge

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 06-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

1

Police Station

ADHAURA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103(1),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Chandrama Ram

    Adv. Vinod Kumar Choubey

  2. 2.Phul Kumari Devi

  3. 3.Prakash Ram

  4. 4.Shiv Parsan Ram

  5. 5.Kabita Devi

  6. 6.Gyan Chand Ram

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Copy of orderView PDF

    Case Summary: Chandrama Ram & Ors. v/s State (ABP 200/2026) The court allowed the anticipatory bail petition for six petitioners accused under sections 103(1) and 3(5) BNS in connection with a woman's death. The court found that post-mortem evidence indicated the deceased (aged 23) committed suicide by hanging, not murder, and that allegations against the petitioners were general in nature with no direct evidence linking them to the crime. The petitioners were ordered released on bail of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties upon arrest or surrender within two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Distt and Sess Judge

  4. 06-May-2026

    Hearing

    Principal Distt and Sess Judge

  5. 04-May-2026

    Hearing

    Principal Distt and Sess Judge

  6. 02-May-2026

    Hearing

    Principal Distt and Sess Judge

  7. 30-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    Principal Distt and Sess Judge

  8. 29-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    Principal Distt and Sess Judge

  9. 28-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    Principal Distt and Sess Judge

  10. 21-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    Principal Distt and Sess Judge

  11. 20-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    Principal Distt and Sess Judge

  12. 18-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    Principal Distt and Sess Judge

  13. 16-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    Principal Distt and Sess Judge

  14. 15-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    Principal Distt and Sess Judge

  15. 13-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    Principal Distt and Sess Judge

  16. 10-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    Principal Distt and Sess Judge

  17. 09-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    Principal Distt and Sess Judge

  18. 07-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    Principal Distt and Sess Judge

  19. 04-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    Principal Distt and Sess Judge

  20. 01-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    Principal Distt and Sess Judge

  21. 26-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal Distt and Sess Judge

  22. 25-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal Distt and Sess Judge

  23. 16-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal Distt and Sess Judge

  24. 06-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal Distt and Sess Judge

  25. 28-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal Distt and Sess Judge

  26. 27-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal Distt and Sess Judge

  27. 26-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal Distt and Sess Judge

  28. 25-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal Distt and Sess Judge

  29. 24-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal Distt and Sess Judge

  30. 21-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal Distt and Sess Judge

  31. 20-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal Distt and Sess Judge

  32. 19-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal Distt and Sess Judge

  33. 18-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal Distt and Sess Judge

  34. 11-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal Distt and Sess Judge

  35. 31-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  36. 30-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 200/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Chandrama Ram & Ors. v/s State (ABP 200/2026) The court allowed the anticipatory bail petition for six petitioners accused under sections 103(1) and 3(5) BNS in connection with a woman's death. The court found that post-mortem evidence indicated the deceased (aged 23) committed suicide by hanging, not murder, and that allegations against the petitioners were general in nature with no direct evidence linking them to the crime. The petitioners were ordered released on bail of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties upon arrest or surrender within two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case