SABERA KHATOON vs STATE OF BIHAR — 14/2026

Case under Juvenile Justice Act Section 101. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 21st April 2026.

Case disposed

CRI. APPEAL

CNR: BRKI010008372026

Filing Number

750/2026

Filing Date

13-Mar-2026

Registration No

14/2026

Registration Date

13-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Kishanganj

Judge

1-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

Decision Date

21-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 22-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

50

Police Station

MAHILA PS KISHANGANJ

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Juvenile Justice Act Section 101

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SABERA KHATOON

    Adv. KAIFI TABREJ

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF BIHAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 21-Apr-2026

    Copy of document.View PDF

  3. 21-Apr-2026

    Copy of document.View PDF

    The Additional Sessions Judge, Kishanganj modified the previous order dated 21.04.2026 to correct typographical errors regarding the chargesheet and witness examination details. The court clarified that while police submitted a final form, the POCSO Court took cognizance under IPC Section 376 and POCSO Act Section 4, and that no witnesses had been examined before the JJB, contrary to the earlier erroneous order mentioning 3 of 10 witnesses examined. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 21-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  5. 16-Apr-2026

    Awaiting for L. C. R.

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  6. 10-Apr-2026

    Awaiting for L. C. R.

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  7. 19-Mar-2026

    Awaiting for L. C. R.

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  8. 18-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 13-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 14/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Sessions Judge, Kishanganj modified the previous order dated 21.04.2026 to correct typographical errors regarding the chargesheet and witness examination details. The court clarified that while police submitted a final form, the POCSO Court took cognizance under IPC Section 376 and POCSO Act Section 4, and that no witnesses had been examined before the JJB, contrary to the earlier erroneous order mentioning 3 of 10 witnesses examined. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case