MUSTAFA vs STATE OF BIHAR — 93/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 137(2). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 22nd April 2026.
Regular Bail
CNR: BRKI010008192026
Filing Number
735/2026
Filing Date
12-Mar-2026
Registration No
93/2026
Registration Date
12-Mar-2026
Court
DJ Div. Kishanganj
Judge
1-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
Decision Date
22-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Last updated 02-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
384
Police Station
KOCHADHAMAN
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MUSTAFA
Adv. YAMUNA PRASAD SAHA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF BIHAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
22-Apr-2026
Copy of document.View PDF
Summary of Case 93/2026: Mustafa v. State of Bihar The Additional Sessions Judge, Kishanganj, rejected Mustafa's bail petition on 22-04-2026. Mustafa was accused of kidnapping a 12-year-old girl on 06-07-2025, extorting ransom, and trafficking her. The victim's statement recorded during investigation confirmed the petitioner forcibly took her, transported her by train to Chandigarh, exploited her in flesh trade, and committed rape. The court found the allegations serious and corroborated by witness evidence, declining bail despite the petitioner's claims of voluntary accompaniment and settlement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
22-Apr-2026
Disposed
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
-
13-Apr-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
-
30-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
-
17-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
-
13-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 93/2026
Summary of Case 93/2026: Mustafa v. State of Bihar The Additional Sessions Judge, Kishanganj, rejected Mustafa's bail petition on 22-04-2026. Mustafa was accused of kidnapping a 12-year-old girl on 06-07-2025, extorting ransom, and trafficking her. The victim's statement recorded during investigation confirmed the petitioner forcibly took her, transported her by train to Chandigarh, exploited her in flesh trade, and committed rape. The court found the allegations serious and corroborated by witness evidence, declining bail despite the petitioner's claims of voluntary accompaniment and settlement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts