GULAM JILANI vs STATE OF BIHAR — 90/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),126(2),109(1),117(2),351(2),352,74,303(2)/3(5). Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED ON WITHDRAWAL on 08th April 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BRKI010008132026

Filing Number

730/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

90/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Kishanganj

Judge

2-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

08-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED ON WITHDRAWAL

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

21

Police Station

PAHARKATTA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),126(2),109(1),117(2),351(2),352,74,303(2)/3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GULAM JILANI

    Adv. DEEPAK KUMAR SAHNI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF BIHAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Apr-2026

    Copy of document.View PDF

    Case Summary: Gulam Jilani v. State of Bihar (90/2026) The Sessions Judge, Kishanganj dismissed the bail petition filed by Gulam Jilani as withdrawn on 08-04-2026. The petitioner's counsel requested withdrawal after the case was committed to the court of session for trial, stating the petitioner preferred to file a bail application in the session trial record instead. The State did not oppose the withdrawal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 26-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 90/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Gulam Jilani v. State of Bihar (90/2026) The Sessions Judge, Kishanganj dismissed the bail petition filed by Gulam Jilani as withdrawn on 08-04-2026. The petitioner's counsel requested withdrawal after the case was committed to the court of session for trial, stating the petitioner preferred to file a bail application in the session trial record instead. The State did not oppose the withdrawal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case