JANARDAN SHARMA vs RAJIV KUMAR RAVI — 21/2015

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 15. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 18-Jun-2026 this date has passed

Title Suit

CNR: BRKH120000142018

Filing Number

10/2018

Filing Date

04-Nov-2015

Registration No

21/2015

Registration Date

04-Nov-2015

Court

Gogri Civil Division

Judge

1-Sub Judge - I

Last updated 17-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 15

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JANARDAN SHARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAJIV KUMAR RAVI

  2. 2.DHANANJAY SHARMA

  3. 3.BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER (BDO)

Case History

  1. 18-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 29-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Sub Judge - I

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Sub Judge - I

  4. 17-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Sub Judge - I

  5. 18-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Sub Judge - I

  6. 01-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Sub Judge - I

  7. 31-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Sub Judge - I

  8. 25-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Sub Judge - I

  9. 16-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Sub Judge - I

  10. 21-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Sub Judge - I

  11. 23-May-2025

    Evidence

    Sub Judge - I

  12. 22-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Sub Judge - I

  13. 28-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Sub Judge - I

  14. 16-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Sub Judge - I

  15. 19-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Sub Judge - I

  16. 05-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Sub Judge - I

  17. 27-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Sub Judge - I

  18. 24-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Sub Judge - I

  19. 07-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    Sub Judge - I

  20. 09-May-2024

    Evidence

    Sub Judge - I

  21. 04-May-2024

    Evidence

    Sub Judge - I

  22. 03-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    Sub Judge - I

  23. 25-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    Sub Judge - I

  24. 11-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    Sub Judge - I

  25. 25-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    Sub Judge - I

  26. 23-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    Sub Judge - I

  27. 14-Jul-2023

    Evidence

    Sub Judge - I

  28. 08-Jun-2023

    Evidence

    Sub Judge - I

  29. 03-Jun-2023

    Evidence

    Sub Judge - I

  30. 02-Jun-2023

    Evidence

    Sub Judge - I

  31. 01-Jun-2023

    Evidence

    Sub Judge - I

  32. 30-May-2023

    Evidence

    Sub Judge - I

  33. 19-May-2023

    Evidence

    Sub Judge - I

  34. 11-May-2023

    Evidence

    Sub Judge - I

  35. 31-Mar-2023

    Evidence

    Sub Judge - I

  36. 17-Mar-2023

    Evidence

    Sub Judge - I

  37. 24-Feb-2023

    Evidence

    Sub Judge - I

  38. 04-Feb-2023

    Evidence

    Sub Judge - I

  39. 19-Jan-2023

    Evidence

    Sub Judge - I

  40. 09-Jan-2023

    Evidence

    Sub Judge - I

  41. 08-Dec-2022

    Evidence

    Sub Judge - I

  42. 17-Nov-2022

    Evidence

    Sub Judge - I

  43. 30-Aug-2022

    Evidence

    Sub Judge - I

  44. 10-Aug-2022

    Evidence

    Sub Judge - I

  45. 18-Jul-2022

    Evidence

    Sub Judge - I

  46. 23-Jun-2022

    Evidence

    Sub Judge - I

  47. 15-Jun-2022

    Evidence

    Sub Judge - I

  48. 02-Jun-2022

    Appearence

    Sub Judge - I

  49. 31-Mar-2022

    Appearence

    Sub Judge - I

  50. 28-Jan-2022

    Appearence

    Sub Judge - I

  51. 09-Dec-2021

    Appearence

    Sub Judge - I

  52. 01-Oct-2021

    Appearence

    Sub Judge - I

  53. 05-Aug-2021

    Appearence

  54. 22-Jun-2021

    Appearence

  55. 13-Apr-2021

    Appearence

    Sub Judge - I

  56. 18-Mar-2021

    Appearence

    Sub Judge - I

  57. 22-Jan-2021

    OrderView PDF

    Summary: The petition filed by the plaintiffs under Order 6 Rule 17 of the CPC seeking amendment to the plaint was allowed. The court permitted correction of a typographical error in the sale deed registration dates from 8/9/2013 to the correct date of 8/3/2013 in the plaint schedule, as the amendment was formal in nature and did not alter the suit's character. The plaintiffs were directed to amend the plaint within the stipulated period, with the case adjourned to 18-03-2021 for compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  58. 22-Jan-2021

    Appearence

    Sub Judge - I

  59. 24-Nov-2020

    Appearence

    Sub Judge - I

  60. 22-Sep-2020

    Appearence

    Sub Judge - I

  61. 03-Aug-2020

    Appearence

    Sub Judge - I

  62. 12-Jun-2020

    Appearence

    Sub Judge - I

  63. 01-May-2020

    Appearence

    Sub Judge - I

  64. 30-Mar-2020

    Appearence

    Sub Judge - I

  65. 06-Feb-2020

    Appearence

    Sub Judge - I

  66. 01-Feb-2020

    Appearence

    Sub Judge - I

  67. 18-Jan-2020

    Appearence

    Sub Judge - I

  68. 14-Nov-2019

    Hearing

    Sub Judge - I

  69. 14-Jun-2019

    Appearence

    Sub Judge - I

  70. 04-May-2019

    Appearence

    Sub Judge - I

  71. 02-Apr-2019

    Appearence

    Sub Judge - I

  72. 08-Mar-2019

    Appearence

    Sub Judge - I

  73. 22-Jan-2019

    Hearing

    Sub Judge - I

  74. 14-Dec-2018

    Hearing

    Sub Judge - I

  75. 19-Nov-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  76. 04-Nov-2015

    Case filed

    Registration No. 21/2015

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The petition filed by the plaintiffs under Order 6 Rule 17 of the CPC seeking amendment to the plaint was allowed. The court permitted correction of a typographical error in the sale deed registration dates from 8/9/2013 to the correct date of 8/3/2013 in the plaint schedule, as the amendment was formal in nature and did not alter the suit's character. The plaintiffs were directed to amend the plaint within the stipulated period, with the case adjourned to 18-03-2021 for compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case