Jasmeen Khatoon vs Md. Firoj Alias Sahmat — 80/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 144. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED AS COMPROMISE on 12th May 2026.

Case disposed

Maintainance

CNR: BRKH010061932025

Filing Number

283/2025

Filing Date

21-Aug-2025

Registration No

80/2025

Registration Date

21-Aug-2025

Court

DJ Div. Khagaria

Judge

2-Principle Judge,Family Court

Decision Date

12-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED AS COMPROMISE

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 144

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Jasmeen Khatoon

    Adv. Md. Wazih Imam

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Md. Firoj Alias Sahmat

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-May-2026

    DismissedView PDF

    Case 80/2025 Summary The Principal District Court of Surguja dismissed Jasmeen Khatoon's petition against Md. Firoj Alias Sahmat. The court found no merit in the petitioner's claims and ruled that the respondent is not bound by any obligation toward the petitioner. The court directed the petitioner to pursue appropriate civil remedies if she has any legitimate grievance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-May-2026

    Disposed

    Principle Judge,Family Court

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Notice (Ready

    Principle Judge,Family Court

  5. 19-Feb-2026

    Notice (Ready

    Principle Judge,Family Court

  6. 08-Jan-2026

    Notice (Ready

    Principle Judge,Family Court

  7. 12-Nov-2025

    Notice (Ready

    Principle Judge,Family Court

  8. 23-Sep-2025

    Notice (Ready

    Principle Judge,Family Court

  9. 23-Aug-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 21-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 80/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case 80/2025 Summary The Principal District Court of Surguja dismissed Jasmeen Khatoon's petition against Md. Firoj Alias Sahmat. The court found no merit in the petitioner's claims and ruled that the respondent is not bound by any obligation toward the petitioner. The court directed the petitioner to pursue appropriate civil remedies if she has any legitimate grievance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case