Secretary And Others vs Gopal Prasad Nawetiya — 7/2023

Case under Arbitration Act Section 34. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 16th March 2026.

Miscellaneous

CNR: BRKH010036502023

Case disposed

Filing Number

72/2023

Filing Date

11-04-2023

Registration No

7/2023

Registration Date

11-04-2023

Court

DJ Div. Khagaria

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

16th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

Arbitration Act Section 34

Petitioner(s)

Secretary And Others

Adv. Manwendra Kumar

Respondent(s)

Gopal Prasad Nawetiya

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

16-03-2026

Disposed

06-01-2026

ORDER

18-12-2025

ARGUMENTS

16-12-2025

ARGUMENTS

09-12-2025

ARGUMENTS

Final Orders / Judgements

16-03-2026
Allowed

Case Summary: Civil Misc. Case No. 03 of 2023 The Principal District Judge at Khagaria set aside a 2017 arbitral award in favor of contractor Gopal Prasad Nawetiya for Rs. 5,14,485/- on multiple grounds. The court found the contractor's claim was barred by the three-year limitation period (expired 14.03.1994), as he accepted on 15.03.1991 that no amount was due, yet raised claims only in 2005. Additionally, the arbitrator violated statutory procedures under the Arbitration & Conciliation Act by adjudicating claims without statements of claim and defence (Section 23), and provided cryptic reasoning (Section 31). The award was also contrary to public policy as it involved a time-barred claim, making it non-enforceable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Civil Misc. Case No. 03 of 2023 The Principal District Judge at Khagaria set aside a 2017 arbitral award in favor of contractor Gopal Prasad Nawetiya for Rs. 5,14,485/- on multiple grounds. The court found the contractor's claim was barred by the three-year limitation period (expired 14.03.1994), as he accepted on 15.03.1991 that no amount was due, yet raised claims only in 2005. Additionally, the arbitrator violated statutory procedures under the Arbitration & Conciliation Act by adjudicating claims without statements of claim and defence (Section 23), and provided cryptic reasoning (Section 31). The award was also contrary to public policy as it involved a time-barred claim, making it non-enforceable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DJ Div. Khagaria All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case