Pawan Yadav vs State Of Bihar — 275/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 30th April 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BRKH010021912026

Filing Number

2094/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

275/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Khagaria

Judge

27-District and Additional Sessions Judge - III

Decision Date

30-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

41

Police Station

MURKAHI

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Pawan Yadav

    Adv. Radhe Prasad Yadav

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Apr-2026

    DismissedView PDF

    Case Summary: Pawan Yadav v. State of Bihar (B.A. No. 275/2026) The court dismissed Pawan Yadav's bail application in an Arms Act case (sections 25(1-B)(a), 26). The petitioner was found in conscious possession of illegal country-made pistols and ammunition recovered from his house during a police raid on 28.02.2026. The court held that the serious nature of the offense, its implications for public safety, and the incriminating evidence against him did not warrant bail at that stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District and Additional Sessions Judge - III

  4. 21-Apr-2026

    Awaiting for Case Diary

    District and Additional Sessions Judge - III

  5. 07-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge - III

  6. 28-Mar-2026

    Hearing

  7. 18-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge - III

  8. 16-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 275/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Pawan Yadav v. State of Bihar (B.A. No. 275/2026) The court dismissed Pawan Yadav's bail application in an Arms Act case (sections 25(1-B)(a), 26). The petitioner was found in conscious possession of illegal country-made pistols and ammunition recovered from his house during a police raid on 28.02.2026. The court held that the serious nature of the offense, its implications for public safety, and the incriminating evidence against him did not warrant bail at that stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case