gana devi and others vs state of bihar — 280/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 23rd April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRKH010021902026
e-Filing Number
12-03-2026
Filing Number
2093/2026
Filing Date
12-Mar-2026
Registration No
280/2026
Registration Date
12-Mar-2026
Court
DJ Div. Khagaria
Judge
26-District and Additional Sessions Judge - II
Decision Date
23-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
360
Police Station
KHAGARIA
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.gana devi and others
Adv. Bipin Kumar Singh
Respondent(s)
-
1.state of bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Apr-2026
RejectedView PDF
The court rejected the petition filed by Gana Devi and others against the State of Bihar, finding the application premature as no final evidence had been presented and the investigation petition lacked substantive grounds. The court held that the allegations of dacoity and related offenses could not be established without proper evidence, and therefore dismissed the original criminal application for being wholly devoid of merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Apr-2026
Disposed
District and Additional Sessions Judge - II
-
20-Apr-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Sessions Judge - II
-
07-Apr-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Sessions Judge - II
-
28-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Sessions Judge - II
-
26-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Sessions Judge - II
-
25-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Sessions Judge - II
-
18-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Sessions Judge - II
-
16-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 280/2026
The court rejected the petition filed by Gana Devi and others against the State of Bihar, finding the application premature as no final evidence had been presented and the investigation petition lacked substantive grounds. The court held that the allegations of dacoity and related offenses could not be established without proper evidence, and therefore dismissed the original criminal application for being wholly devoid of merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts