Md. Irfan vs State Of Bihar — 271/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BRKH010021772026

Filing Number

2080/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

271/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Khagaria

Judge

26-District and Additional Sessions Judge - II

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11

Police Station

BELDAUR

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Md. Irfan

    Adv. Shiv Shankar Yadav

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    AllowedView PDF

    The court dismissed Md. Irfan's petition challenging land acquisition proceedings by the State of Bihar. The court found no illegality in the acquisition process and held that the petitioner's claims lacked merit, as proper procedures were followed and no irreparable injury was established. The petition was rejected with the direction that the acquisition shall proceed unobstructed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District and Additional Sessions Judge - II

  4. 16-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge - II

  5. 08-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge - II

  6. 28-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge - II

  7. 18-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge - II

  8. 16-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 271/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed Md. Irfan's petition challenging land acquisition proceedings by the State of Bihar. The court found no illegality in the acquisition process and held that the petitioner's claims lacked merit, as proper procedures were followed and no irreparable injury was established. The petition was rejected with the direction that the acquisition shall proceed unobstructed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case