Suruchi Kumari vs Rampari Devi — 163/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 498(A), 313, 504, 34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

SESSION CASE

CNR: BRKH010021632026

Filing Number

2068/2026

Filing Date

29-Apr-2025

Registration No

163/2026

Registration Date

29-Apr-2025

Court

DJ Div. Khagaria

Judge

3-District and Additional Sessions Judge -I

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

19

Police Station

Mahila P.S Khagaria

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 498(A), 313, 504, 34
Dowry Prohibition (D.p) Act Section 3, 4

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Suruchi Kumari

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Rampari Devi

  2. 2.Hemant Kumar alias Mahesh Kumar

  3. 3.Nutan Kumari

  4. 4.Panchanand Modi

  5. 5.Mamta Devi

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Judgment/AcquittalView PDF

    The court convicted accused Rampari Devi, Hemant Kumar (alias Mahesh Kumar), and Nutan Kumari under IPC sections 498A/34, 313/34, and 504/34, as well as the Dowry Prohibition Act, finding them guilty of demanding dowry, subjecting the petitioner (Suruchi Kumari) to cruelty, and causing injury. The court found the accused's defense insufficient and awarded the petitioner compensation for dowry harassment and cruel treatment during her marriage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District and Additional Sessions Judge -I

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 29-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 163/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted accused Rampari Devi, Hemant Kumar (alias Mahesh Kumar), and Nutan Kumari under IPC sections 498A/34, 313/34, and 504/34, as well as the Dowry Prohibition Act, finding them guilty of demanding dowry, subjecting the petitioner (Suruchi Kumari) to cruelty, and causing injury. The court found the accused's defense insufficient and awarded the petitioner compensation for dowry harassment and cruel treatment during her marriage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case