Manoj Roy And Others vs State Of Bihar — 151/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRI. BAIL APPLN.

CNR: BRKH010021062026

Filing Number

2016/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

151/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Khagaria

Judge

3-District and Additional Sessions Judge -I

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Manoj Roy And Others

    Adv. Amarendra Kumar Mishra

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    AllowedView PDF

    The court allowed the petition filed by Manoj Roy and others, finding that the State of Bihar violated the petitioners' constitutional rights by not following proper procedure before issuing a dismissal order. The court held that the respondents' submission regarding jurisdiction under Article 82 was invalid and that the dismissal lacked legal authority since the petitioners were not given adequate opportunity to be heard. Consequently, the court directed the petitioners be paid compensation of Rs. 1,000-1,000 per person as cost, with the dismissal order set aside and directions given that the petitioners' employment be reinstated with linked benefits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Additional Sessions Judge -I

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 151/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed the petition filed by Manoj Roy and others, finding that the State of Bihar violated the petitioners' constitutional rights by not following proper procedure before issuing a dismissal order. The court held that the respondents' submission regarding jurisdiction under Article 82 was invalid and that the dismissal lacked legal authority since the petitioners were not given adequate opportunity to be heard. Consequently, the court directed the petitioners be paid compensation of Rs. 1,000-1,000 per person as cost, with the dismissal order set aside and directions given that the petitioners' employment be reinstated with linked benefits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case