Abhishek Kumar And Others vs State Of Bihar — 150/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRI. BAIL APPLN.

CNR: BRKH010021052026

Filing Number

2015/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

150/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Khagaria

Judge

3-District and Additional Sessions Judge -I

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

309

Police Station

ALAULI

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Abhishek Kumar And Others

    Adv. Gajendra Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    AllowedView PDF

    The court partially allowed the petition filed by Abhishek Kumar and others against the State of Bihar. The court found merit in the petitioners' allegations regarding criminal intimidation and property disputes, noting that the petition raised cognizable offenses under IPC sections 341, 323, 504, 354, 506, 509/34 and SC/ST Act provisions. The court directed the District Magistrate, Kaimur to deposit ₹1,000 per petitioner as litigation cost with the district authorities and ordered that the petition be treated as an FIR, with appropriate action taken to protect the petitioners' family interests. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Additional Sessions Judge -I

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 150/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court partially allowed the petition filed by Abhishek Kumar and others against the State of Bihar. The court found merit in the petitioners' allegations regarding criminal intimidation and property disputes, noting that the petition raised cognizable offenses under IPC sections 341, 323, 504, 354, 506, 509/34 and SC/ST Act provisions. The court directed the District Magistrate, Kaimur to deposit ₹1,000 per petitioner as litigation cost with the district authorities and ordered that the petition be treated as an FIR, with appropriate action taken to protect the petitioners' family interests. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case