Dularchand Yadav vs STATE OF BIHAR — 268/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRKH010020922026

e-Filing Number

09-03-2026

Filing Number

2002/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

268/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Khagaria

Judge

3-District and Additional Sessions Judge -I

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 17-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

39

Police Station

Paura

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Dularchand Yadav

    Adv. Rajiv Kumar

  2. 2.Vilas Yadav(Legal Heir)

    Adv. Rajiv Kumar

  3. 3.Dilip Yadav(Legal Heir)

    Adv. Rajiv Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF BIHAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    AllowedView PDF

    The High Court of Chhattisgarh rejected the bail application of accused Dularshand Yadav, finding him guilty of criminal offenses under IPC Sections 126(2), 115(2), 352, 308(2), 308(5), 351(2), and 3(5) BNS. The court held that the application lacked merit as the evidence against the accused was sufficient, and there were no grounds to suspend the bail conditions. The court ordered that both the accused and any abettors remain bound by strict bail conditions and directed them to remain close to their families. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District and Additional Sessions Judge -I

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge -I

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge -I

  6. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 268/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Chhattisgarh rejected the bail application of accused Dularshand Yadav, finding him guilty of criminal offenses under IPC Sections 126(2), 115(2), 352, 308(2), 308(5), 351(2), and 3(5) BNS. The court held that the application lacked merit as the evidence against the accused was sufficient, and there were no grounds to suspend the bail conditions. The court ordered that both the accused and any abettors remain bound by strict bail conditions and directed them to remain close to their families. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case