Golu Singh vs State Of Bihar — 252/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BRKH010020842026

Filing Number

1994/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

252/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Khagaria

Judge

26-District and Additional Sessions Judge - II

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 17-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

180

Police Station

CHAUTHAM

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Golu Singh

    Adv. Mrityunjay Gandhi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    AllowedView PDF

    The court dismissed the petition filed by Golu Singh against the land record order dated 26.11.2025. The court found that the appellant's claim regarding land ownership was not substantiated and that the opposing parties had established their superior rights over the disputed land through proper documentation and evidence. The court upheld the original order and directed the appellant to pay Rs. 10,000 to each of the two respondents as costs for the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District and Additional Sessions Judge - II

  4. 16-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge - II

  5. 04-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge - II

  6. 30-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge - II

  7. 24-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge - II

  8. 13-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge - II

  9. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 252/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the petition filed by Golu Singh against the land record order dated 26.11.2025. The court found that the appellant's claim regarding land ownership was not substantiated and that the opposing parties had established their superior rights over the disputed land through proper documentation and evidence. The court upheld the original order and directed the appellant to pay Rs. 10,000 to each of the two respondents as costs for the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case