Tunna Singh Alias Avinash Kumar And Others vs State Of Bihar — 147/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRI. BAIL APPLN.

CNR: BRKH010020562026

Filing Number

1966/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

147/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Khagaria

Judge

3-District and Additional Sessions Judge -I

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 17-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

64

Police Station

Khagaria Harizan P.S

Year

2013

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Tunna Singh Alias Avinash Kumar And Others

    Adv. Azad Thakur

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    AllowedView PDF

    The District and Sessions Court (SC/ST), Khagariya, allowed the appeal filed by Dhulna Singh and others against the conviction under SC/ST Act provisions. The court found that the allegations lacked sufficient evidence and the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt, noting inconsistencies in the victim's account and absence of corroborating evidence. The court imposed a cost of Rs. 1,000 each on the appellants to be deposited with the district legal services authority, and directed that both the appellants and their family members be brought before the court for proper advice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Additional Sessions Judge -I

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 147/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The District and Sessions Court (SC/ST), Khagariya, allowed the appeal filed by Dhulna Singh and others against the conviction under SC/ST Act provisions. The court found that the allegations lacked sufficient evidence and the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt, noting inconsistencies in the victim's account and absence of corroborating evidence. The court imposed a cost of Rs. 1,000 each on the appellants to be deposited with the district legal services authority, and directed that both the appellants and their family members be brought before the court for proper advice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case