Md Ehtesham Alam vs State Of Bihar — 20/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

Special A.B.A - Special Anticipatory Bail Appl

CNR: BRKH010019492026

e-Filing Number

01-03-2026

Filing Number

1865/2026

Filing Date

02-Mar-2026

Registration No

20/2026

Registration Date

02-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Khagaria

Judge

3-District and Additional Sessions Judge -I

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

FIR Details

Police Station

MURKAHI

Year

0

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Md Ehtesham Alam

    Adv. Ajay Kumar Singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    AllowedView PDF

    Case Summary: Md Ehtesham Alam v. State of Bihar (20/2026) The court rejected the petitioner's plea challenging alleged unlawful detention and procedural violations under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940, finding no prima facie case of illegality or breach of statutory procedures. The court imposed costs of Rs. 1,000 on the petitioner and directed the State to deposit Rs. 10,000 as security under BNSS provisions, while permitting police action against both parties if evidence warrants prosecution under applicable law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Additional Sessions Judge -I

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 20/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Md Ehtesham Alam v. State of Bihar (20/2026) The court rejected the petitioner's plea challenging alleged unlawful detention and procedural violations under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940, finding no prima facie case of illegality or breach of statutory procedures. The court imposed costs of Rs. 1,000 on the petitioner and directed the State to deposit Rs. 10,000 as security under BNSS provisions, while permitting police action against both parties if evidence warrants prosecution under applicable law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case