State of Bihar Through Gita Devi vs Mohit Yadav — 135/2018
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 366-120b. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 16th March 2026.
SESSION CASE
CNR: BRKH010017602018
Filing Number
1324/2018
Filing Date
07-May-2018
Registration No
135/2018
Registration Date
07-May-2018
Court
DJ Div. Khagaria
Judge
3-District and Additional Sessions Judge -I
Decision Date
16-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
373
Police Station
KHAGARIA
Year
2006
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Bihar Through Gita Devi
Respondent(s)
-
1.Mohit Yadav
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Mar-2026
Judgment/AcquittalView PDF
Summary of Case 135/2018 The court found the accused, Mohit Yadav, guilty under IPC Section 366 for abducting a girl from Sahariya community. The court rejected the accused's defense that the girl went willingly with him, holding that the evidence and victim's testimony established the offense. The court sentenced him accordingly, finding no merit in his claims and confirming that the accused benefited the girl to no legitimate purpose. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Disposed
District and Additional Sessions Judge -I
-
19-Jan-2026
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge -I
-
06-Dec-2025
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge -VIII
-
07-Oct-2025
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge -VIII
-
19-Aug-2025
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge -VIII
-
04-Jul-2025
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge -VIII
-
15-May-2025
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge -VIII
-
29-Apr-2025
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge -VIII
-
25-Mar-2025
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge -VIII
-
25-Feb-2025
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge -VIII
-
24-Jan-2025
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge -VIII
-
16-Dec-2024
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge -VIII
-
20-Nov-2024
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge -VIII
-
04-Oct-2024
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge -VIII
-
11-Sep-2024
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge -VIII
-
14-Aug-2024
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge -VIII
-
30-Jul-2024
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge -VIII
-
01-Jul-2024
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge -VIII
-
30-May-2024
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge -VII
-
30-Apr-2024
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge -VII
-
28-Mar-2024
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge -VII
-
27-Feb-2024
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge -VII
-
26-Feb-2024
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge -VII
-
24-Jan-2024
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge -VII
-
20-Dec-2023
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge -VII
-
05-Dec-2023
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge -VII
-
17-Oct-2023
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge -VII
-
18-Sep-2023
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge -VII
-
01-Sep-2023
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge -VII
-
03-Aug-2023
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge -VII
-
04-Jul-2023
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge -VII
-
01-Jun-2023
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge -VII
-
26-Apr-2023
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge -VII
-
17-Mar-2023
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge -VII
-
09-Feb-2023
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge -VII
-
05-Jan-2023
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge -VII
-
30-Nov-2022
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge -VII
-
03-Nov-2022
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge -VII
-
22-Sep-2022
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge -VII
-
18-Aug-2022
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge -VII
-
14-Jul-2022
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge -VII
-
16-Jun-2022
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge -VII
-
22-Apr-2022
Evidence
-
28-Feb-2022
Evidence
-
11-Jan-2022
Evidence
-
17-Nov-2021
Evidence
-
13-Sep-2021
Evidence
-
07-Aug-2021
Evidence
-
01-Jul-2021
Evidence
-
01-Jun-2021
Evidence
Presiding Officer Ftc II
-
20-Apr-2021
Evidence
Presiding Officer Ftc II
-
09-Mar-2021
Evidence
Presiding Officer Ftc II
-
01-Feb-2021
Evidence
Presiding Officer Ftc II
-
26-Nov-2020
Evidence
Presiding Officer Ftc I
-
07-Oct-2020
Evidence
Presiding Officer Ftc I
-
08-Jul-2020
Evidence
Presiding Officer Ftc I
-
20-May-2020
Evidence
Presiding Officer Ftc I
-
30-Apr-2020
Evidence
Presiding Officer Ftc I
-
07-Apr-2020
Evidence
Presiding Officer Ftc I
-
20-Mar-2020
Evidence
Presiding Officer Ftc I
-
28-Feb-2020
Evidence
Presiding Officer Ftc I
-
05-Feb-2020
Evidence
Presiding Officer Ftc I
-
21-Jan-2020
Evidence
Presiding Officer Ftc I
-
06-Jan-2020
Evidence
Presiding Officer Ftc I
-
16-Dec-2019
Evidence
Presiding Officer Ftc I
-
14-Nov-2019
Evidence
Presiding Officer Ftc I
-
16-Oct-2019
Evidence
Presiding Officer Ftc I
-
16-Sep-2019
Evidence
Presiding Officer Ftc I
-
19-Aug-2019
Evidence
Presiding Officer Ftc I
-
23-Jul-2019
Evidence
Presiding Officer Ftc I
-
26-Jun-2019
Evidence
Presiding Officer Ftc I
-
20-May-2019
Evidence
Presiding Officer Ftc I
-
18-Apr-2019
Evidence
Presiding Officer Ftc I
-
13-Mar-2019
Evidence
Presiding Officer Ftc I
-
11-Feb-2019
Evidence
Presiding Officer Ftc I
-
23-Jan-2019
Evidence
Presiding Officer Ftc I
-
20-Dec-2018
Evidence
Presiding Officer Ftc I
-
16-Nov-2018
Evidence
Presiding Officer Ftc I
-
05-Oct-2018
Evidence
Presiding Officer Ftc I
-
13-Sep-2018
Evidence
Presiding Officer Ftc I
-
21-Aug-2018
Evidence
Presiding Officer Ftc I
-
01-Aug-2018
Charge
Presiding Officer Ftc I
-
12-Jul-2018
Charge
Presiding Officer Ftc I
-
22-May-2018
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-May-2018
Case filed
Registration No. 135/2018
Summary of Case 135/2018 The court found the accused, Mohit Yadav, guilty under IPC Section 366 for abducting a girl from Sahariya community. The court rejected the accused's defense that the girl went willingly with him, holding that the evidence and victim's testimony established the offense. The court sentenced him accordingly, finding no merit in his claims and confirming that the accused benefited the girl to no legitimate purpose. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts