Govind Kumar vs State Of Bihar — 210/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 28th March 2026.
Regular Bail
CNR: BRKH010016682026
Filing Number
1600/2026
Filing Date
20-Feb-2026
Registration No
210/2026
Registration Date
20-Feb-2026
Court
DJ Div. Khagaria
Judge
32-District and Additional Sessions Judge - VI
Decision Date
28-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Last updated 06-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
492
Police Station
ALAULI
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Govind Kumar
Adv. Shyambali Chaudhary
Respondent(s)
-
1.State Of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
28-Mar-2026
RejectedView PDF
The Special Judge under POCSO Act, Khagaria rejected the bail application of Govind Kumar in case 210/2026. The accused was charged under IPC Sections 137(2), 96, and 3(5) BNSS for allegedly kidnapping a 14-year-old girl on 04-11-2025. The court found the victim's statement under Section 183 BNSS and investigative evidence credible, establishing the accused's direct involvement, and determined that bail could not be granted considering the case's severity, the victim's minor age, and the nature of allegations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
28-Mar-2026
Disposed
District and Additional Sessions Judge - VI
-
25-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
17-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
25-Feb-2026
Awaiting for Case Diary
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
23-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 210/2026
The Special Judge under POCSO Act, Khagaria rejected the bail application of Govind Kumar in case 210/2026. The accused was charged under IPC Sections 137(2), 96, and 3(5) BNSS for allegedly kidnapping a 14-year-old girl on 04-11-2025. The court found the victim's statement under Section 183 BNSS and investigative evidence credible, establishing the accused's direct involvement, and determined that bail could not be granted considering the case's severity, the victim's minor age, and the nature of allegations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts