Santosh Kumar And Others vs State Of Bihar — 14/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

NDPS BAIL APPLN.

CNR: BRKH010016512026

Filing Number

1583/2026

Filing Date

20-Feb-2026

Registration No

14/2026

Registration Date

20-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Khagaria

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 17-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

10

Police Station

PASRAHA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Santosh Kumar And Others

    Adv. Sushil Prasad Yadav

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    DismissedView PDF

    Summary: The Court of Special Judge, Khagaria dismissed the bail application of Santosh Kumar and Subhash Rai in a narcotic drugs case involving recovery of 754 liters of codeine-laced syrup. The court held that bail conditions under Section 37 of the NDPS Act were not satisfied, as there existed reasonable grounds to believe the accused were guilty and they were likely to commit further offenses while on bail, given the substantial contraband recovery and supporting witness evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 23-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 20-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 14/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Court of Special Judge, Khagaria dismissed the bail application of Santosh Kumar and Subhash Rai in a narcotic drugs case involving recovery of 754 liters of codeine-laced syrup. The court held that bail conditions under Section 37 of the NDPS Act were not satisfied, as there existed reasonable grounds to believe the accused were guilty and they were likely to commit further offenses while on bail, given the substantial contraband recovery and supporting witness evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case