Julum Singh vs State Of Bihar — 191/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BRKH010015182026

Filing Number

1455/2026

Filing Date

17-Feb-2026

Registration No

191/2026

Registration Date

17-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Khagaria

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 17-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Julum Singh

    Adv. Pankaj Kumar Singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    AllowedView PDF

    The Sessions Judge at Khagaria, Bihar granted bail to accused Julum Singh in a dowry case (Complaint Case No. 919c/2012) under IPC sections 498(A) and 3/4 Dowry Act, directing his release on a personal bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount. The court found the allegations against the applicant to be false, fabricated, and concocted, and considered that he had no criminal antecedent and had already been granted pre-arrest bail previously. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Awaiting for Case Diary

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  6. 19-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 17-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 191/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Judge at Khagaria, Bihar granted bail to accused Julum Singh in a dowry case (Complaint Case No. 919c/2012) under IPC sections 498(A) and 3/4 Dowry Act, directing his release on a personal bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount. The court found the allegations against the applicant to be false, fabricated, and concocted, and considered that he had no criminal antecedent and had already been granted pre-arrest bail previously. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case