Rajaram Sharma And Others vs State Of Bihar — 124/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 11th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRKH010010072026
Filing Number
964/2026
Filing Date
02-Feb-2026
Registration No
124/2026
Registration Date
02-Feb-2026
Court
DJ Div. Khagaria
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
11-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 17-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
147
Police Station
Chitragupta Nagar
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Rajaram Sharma And Others
Adv. Chandan Kumar
Respondent(s)
-
1.State Of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Mar-2026
AllowedView PDF
Summary The Sessions Judge at Khagaria (Bihar) granted anticipatory bail to four applicants (Rajaram Sharma, Sanju Devi, Saurabh Sharma, and Arjun Sharma) in a case involving allegations of setting ablaze the sister of an informant. The court found no incriminating material against the applicants, noted they had clean antecedents, and determined there was no risk of them fleeing or tampering with evidence. The applicants were enlarged on bail with a personal bond of Rs. 10,000 each, two sureties of similar amount, and standard conditions including cooperation with investigation and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
18-Feb-2026
Awaiting for Case Diary
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
04-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 124/2026
Summary The Sessions Judge at Khagaria (Bihar) granted anticipatory bail to four applicants (Rajaram Sharma, Sanju Devi, Saurabh Sharma, and Arjun Sharma) in a case involving allegations of setting ablaze the sister of an informant. The court found no incriminating material against the applicants, noted they had clean antecedents, and determined there was no risk of them fleeing or tampering with evidence. The applicants were enlarged on bail with a personal bond of Rs. 10,000 each, two sureties of similar amount, and standard conditions including cooperation with investigation and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts