Bhavichandra Tanti vs Rohit Yadav — 12/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,504,506,324,307,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 11th March 2026.
SC/ST Spl. Case
CNR: BRKH010008632022
Filing Number
773/2022
Filing Date
08-Feb-2022
Registration No
12/2022
Registration Date
08-Feb-2022
Court
DJ Div. Khagaria
Judge
3-District and Additional Sessions Judge -I
Decision Date
11-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 17-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
293
Police Station
ALAULI
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Bhavichandra Tanti
Adv. Spl P.P
Respondent(s)
-
1.Rohit Yadav
-
2.Dilip Yadav
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Mar-2026
Judgment/Acquittal
The court found that the accused persons violated IPC sections 341/34, 323/34, 324/34, 504/34, 506/34, and 307/34, along with SC/ST Act provisions. The court held the prosecution case proved beyond reasonable doubt, finding the accused guilty of the charged offenses. The court noted that the accused's plea of self-defense was not established and the witnesses' accounts sufficiently proved the criminal acts against the complainants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Disposed
District and Additional Sessions Judge -I
-
04-Feb-2026
Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.
District and Additional Sessions Judge -I
-
25-Nov-2025
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge -I
-
15-Sep-2025
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge -I
-
16-Jul-2025
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge -I
-
05-Jun-2025
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge -I
-
25-Apr-2025
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge -I
-
06-Mar-2025
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge -I
-
10-Feb-2025
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge -I
-
20-Jan-2025
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge -I
-
12-Dec-2024
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge -I
-
13-Nov-2024
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge -I
-
21-Sep-2024
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge -I
-
14-Aug-2024
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge -I
-
27-Jun-2024
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge -I
-
21-May-2024
Charge
District and Additional Sessions Judge -I
-
02-Apr-2024
Charge
District and Additional Sessions Judge -I
-
19-Feb-2024
Charge
District and Additional Sessions Judge -I
-
09-Jan-2024
Charge
District and Additional Sessions Judge -I
-
17-Oct-2023
Charge
District and Additional Sessions Judge -I
-
04-Sep-2023
Charge
District and Additional Sessions Judge -I
-
25-Jul-2023
Charge
District and Additional Sessions Judge -I
-
16-Jun-2023
Charge
District and Additional Sessions Judge -I
-
26-Apr-2023
Charge
District and Additional Sessions Judge -I
-
01-Mar-2023
Charge
District and Additional Sessions Judge -I
-
18-Jan-2023
Charge
-
05-Dec-2022
Charge
District and Additional Sessions Judge -I
-
02-Nov-2022
Charge
District and Additional Sessions Judge -I
-
08-Sep-2022
Charge
District and Additional Sessions Judge -I
-
27-Jul-2022
Charge
District and Additional Sessions Judge -I
-
27-Jun-2022
Charge
District and Additional Sessions Judge -I
-
21-May-2022
Charge
District and Additional Sessions Judge -I
-
06-Apr-2022
Charge
District and Additional Sessions Judge -I
-
17-Feb-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Feb-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 12/2022
The court found that the accused persons violated IPC sections 341/34, 323/34, 324/34, 504/34, 506/34, and 307/34, along with SC/ST Act provisions. The court held the prosecution case proved beyond reasonable doubt, finding the accused guilty of the charged offenses. The court noted that the accused's plea of self-defense was not established and the witnesses' accounts sufficiently proved the criminal acts against the complainants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts