RAVINDRA YADAV vs OPINDRA YADAV — 3190/2013
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,324.307,497,24CTACT. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 16th March 2026.
SESSION CASE
CNR: BRKH010000622006
Filing Number
4591/2013
Filing Date
13-Dec-2006
Registration No
3190/2013
Registration Date
26-May-2008
Court
DJ Div. Khagaria
Judge
3-District and Additional Sessions Judge -I
Decision Date
16-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
319
Police Station
GOGARI
Year
2006
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAVINDRA YADAV
Respondent(s)
-
1.OPINDRA YADAV
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Mar-2026
Judgment/Acquittal
The court found that the accused Upendra Yadav is guilty of charges under IPC sections 341, 323, 307, 447, 504, 427, and SC/ST Act provisions. The judgment upheld convictions based on witness testimonies establishing that the accused committed wrongful restraint, voluntarily caused hurt, attempted murder, criminal intimidation, and mischief against the petitioner. The court rejected the accused's defense arguments regarding inconsistencies in witness statements, finding sufficient evidence to sustain the conviction with appropriate relief and compensation ordered for the victim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Disposed
District and Additional Sessions Judge -I
-
27-Feb-2026
Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.
District and Additional Sessions Judge -I
-
02-Feb-2026
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge -I
-
21-Nov-2025
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge -I
-
17-Sep-2025
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge -V
-
18-Jul-2025
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge -V
-
11-Jun-2025
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge -V
-
03-May-2025
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge -V
-
08-Apr-2025
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge - V
-
18-Mar-2025
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge - V
-
23-Jan-2025
Appearence
District and Additional Sessions Judge - V
-
10-Dec-2024
Appearence
District and Additional Sessions Judge - V
-
21-Oct-2024
Appearence
District and Additional Sessions Judge - V
-
19-Sep-2024
Appearence
District and Additional Sessions Judge - V
-
01-Aug-2024
Appearence
District and Additional Sessions Judge - V
-
20-Jun-2024
Appearence
District and Additional Sessions Judge - V
-
06-May-2024
Appearence
District and Additional Sessions Judge - V
-
05-Mar-2024
Appearence
District and Additional Sessions Judge - V
-
28-Nov-2023
Appearence
District and Additional Sessions Judge - III
-
05-Oct-2023
Appearence
District and Additional Sessions Judge - III
-
24-Feb-2022
Appearence
District and Additional Sessions Judge - IV
-
15-Nov-2021
Appearence
District and Additional Sessions Judge - VI
-
21-Sep-2021
Appearence
District and Additional Sessions Judge - VI
-
21-Aug-2021
Appearence
District and Additional Sessions Judge - VI
-
01-Jul-2021
Appearence
District and Additional Sessions Judge - VI
-
12-May-2021
Appearence
District and Additional Sessions Judge - VI
-
05-Apr-2021
Appearence
District and Additional Sessions Judge - VI
-
01-Mar-2021
Appearence
District and Additional Sessions Judge - VI
-
22-Feb-2021
Appearence
District and Additional Sessions Judge - VI
-
13-Jan-2021
Appearence
District and Additional Sessions Judge - VI
-
24-Nov-2020
Appearence
District and Additional Sessions Judge - VI
-
10-Sep-2020
Appearence
District and Additional Sessions Judge - VI
-
24-Jul-2020
Appearence
District and Additional Sessions Judge - VI
-
24-Jun-2020
Appearence
District and Additional Sessions Judge - VI
-
17-Jun-2020
Appearence
District and Additional Sessions Judge - VI
-
13-Feb-2020
Appearence
District and Additional Sessions Judge - VI
-
14-Jan-2020
Appearence
District and Additional Sessions Judge - IV
-
05-Dec-2019
Appearence
District and Additional Sessions Judge - IV
-
21-Oct-2019
Appearence
District and Additional Sessions Judge - IV
-
02-Sep-2019
Appearence
District and Additional Sessions Judge - IV
-
24-Jul-2019
Appearence
District and Additional Sessions Judge - IV
-
03-Jul-2019
Appearence
District and Additional Sessions Judge - IV
-
29-May-2019
Appearence
District and Additional Sessions Judge - IV
-
02-May-2019
Appearence
District and Additional Sessions Judge - IV
-
08-Apr-2019
Appearence
District and Additional Sessions Judge - IV
-
15-Mar-2019
Appearence
District and Additional Sessions Judge - IV
-
19-Feb-2019
Appearence
District and Additional Sessions Judge - IV
-
18-Dec-2018
Appearence
District and Additional Sessions Judge - III
-
26-Sep-2018
Appearence
District and Additional Sessions Judge - III
-
21-Aug-2018
Appearence
District and Additional Sessions Judge - III
-
11-Jun-2018
Appearence
-
26-Apr-2018
Appearence
District and Additional Sessions Judge - III
-
23-Mar-2018
Appearence
District and Additional Sessions Judge - III
-
19-Dec-2017
Appearence
-
01-Aug-2017
Appearence
District and Additional Sessions Judge - III
-
10-Apr-2017
Appearence
District and Additional Sessions Judge - III
-
03-Feb-2017
Appearence
District and Additional Sessions Judge - III
-
10-Jan-2017
Appearence
District and Additional Sessions Judge - III
-
23-Dec-2016
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge - III
-
21-Jul-2016
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge - III
-
19-May-2016
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge - II
-
08-Mar-2016
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge - II
-
04-Dec-2015
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge - II
-
08-Sep-2015
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge - II
-
19-Jun-2015
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge - II
-
16-Apr-2015
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge - II
-
24-Feb-2015
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Dec-2006
Case filed
Registration No. 3190/2013
The court found that the accused Upendra Yadav is guilty of charges under IPC sections 341, 323, 307, 447, 504, 427, and SC/ST Act provisions. The judgment upheld convictions based on witness testimonies establishing that the accused committed wrongful restraint, voluntarily caused hurt, attempted murder, criminal intimidation, and mischief against the petitioner. The court rejected the accused's defense arguments regarding inconsistencies in witness statements, finding sufficient evidence to sustain the conviction with appropriate relief and compensation ordered for the victim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts