State of Bihar vs ARVIND YADAV — 549/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,326,307,379,504,506,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed

SESSION CASE

CNR: BRJE010089352024

Filing Number

549/2024

Filing Date

07-Oct-2024

Registration No

549/2024

Registration Date

07-Oct-2024

Court

Jehanabad DJ Div

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 18-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

133

Police Station

KAKO

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,326,307,379,504,506,34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

    Adv. P.P

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ARVIND YADAV

  2. 2.DHANANJAY KUMAR

  3. 3.CHANDAN KUMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    JudgmentView PDF

    SUMMARY: The Sessions Judge, Jehanabad acquitted all three accused persons—Arvind Yadav, Dhananjay Kumar, and Chandan Kumar—of charges under IPC sections 307/34, 341/34, 504/34, and 379 (attempt to murder, wrongful restraint, criminal intimidation, and theft). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the informant admitted giving the accused's names based on mere suspicion and later compromised the case; three out of five prosecution witnesses turned hostile and confirmed they could not identify the attackers due to darkness at the time of the night incident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge

  4. 16-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    District and Sessions Judge

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.

    District and Sessions Judge

  6. 19-Mar-2026

    Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.

    District and Sessions Judge

  7. 11-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  8. 23-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  9. 22-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  10. 15-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  11. 10-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  12. 18-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  13. 13-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  14. 02-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  15. 28-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  16. 24-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  17. 24-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  18. 18-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  19. 21-May-2025

    Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  20. 02-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  21. 13-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  22. 07-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  23. 20-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  24. 12-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  25. 23-Oct-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  26. 07-Oct-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 549/2024

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: The Sessions Judge, Jehanabad acquitted all three accused persons—Arvind Yadav, Dhananjay Kumar, and Chandan Kumar—of charges under IPC sections 307/34, 341/34, 504/34, and 379 (attempt to murder, wrongful restraint, criminal intimidation, and theft). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the informant admitted giving the accused's names based on mere suspicion and later compromised the case; three out of five prosecution witnesses turned hostile and confirmed they could not identify the attackers due to darkness at the time of the night incident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case