Siddhi Tiwari alias Sidhnath Tiwari vs State of Bihar — 899/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),76,3(5). Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 02nd June 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRJE010050472026

e-Filing Number

25-05-2026

Filing Number

4481/2026

Filing Date

25-May-2026

Registration No

899/2026

Registration Date

25-May-2026

Court

Jehanabad DJ Div

Judge

3-Addl. District and Sessions Judge-I

Decision Date

02-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

Last updated 16-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

159

Police Station

GHOSI

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),76,3(5)
Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 Section 3(1)(r)(s),3(ii)(va)
Pocso Section 8,12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Siddhi Tiwari alias Sidhnath Tiwari

    Adv. Arvind Kumar Verma

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Jun-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court dismissed the anticipatory bail petition filed by Siddhi Tiwari (alias Sidhnath Tiwari) as "not pressed" because neither the petitioner nor his representative appeared on the hearing date of 02-06-2026, despite this being a repeated occurrence. The court found this non-appearance demonstrated the petitioner's negligence regarding the proceedings and accordingly rejected the bail application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Jun-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. District and Sessions Judge-I

  4. 29-May-2026

    Hearing

    Addl. District and Sessions Judge-I

  5. 27-May-2026

    Hearing

    Addl. District and Sessions Judge-I

  6. 26-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 25-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 899/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the anticipatory bail petition filed by Siddhi Tiwari (alias Sidhnath Tiwari) as "not pressed" because neither the petitioner nor his representative appeared on the hearing date of 02-06-2026, despite this being a repeated occurrence. The court found this non-appearance demonstrated the petitioner's negligence regarding the proceedings and accordingly rejected the bail application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case