State of Bihar vs RAJENDRA DAS — 432/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,341,307,379,504,506,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 11th March 2026.
SESSION CASE
CNR: BRJE010044542023
Filing Number
432/2023
Filing Date
15-05-2023
Registration No
432/2023
Registration Date
15-05-2023
Court
Jehanabad DJ Div
Judge
1-District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
131
Police Station
PALI
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Bihar
Adv. P.P
Respondent(s)
RAJENDRA DAS
KAPIL DAS
VINAY DAS
BACHHU DAS
MANORANJAN DAS
RUDHA DEVI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
ARGUMENTS
STATEMENT U/S.313 CR.P.C.
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 10-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 09-03-2026 | STATEMENT U/S.313 CR.P.C. |
| 09-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 17-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Sessions Judge at Jehanabad acquitted all six accused persons (Rajendra Das, Kapil Das, Vinay Das, Bachchu Das, Manoranjan Das, and Radha Devi) of charges under IPC sections 307/34, 341/34, and 504/34, finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. Key witnesses, including the informant and injured parties, admitted during cross-examination that they did not witness the alleged assault and could not identify the assailants, while also stating the case had been compromised. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Sessions Judge at Jehanabad acquitted all six accused persons (Rajendra Das, Kapil Das, Vinay Das, Bachchu Das, Manoranjan Das, and Radha Devi) of charges under IPC sections 307/34, 341/34, and 504/34, finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. Key witnesses, including the informant and injured parties, admitted during cross-examination that they did not witness the alleged assault and could not identify the assailants, while also stating the case had been compromised. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts