Raushan Kumar vs State of Bihar — 407/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),109(1),74,303(2),352, 351(2),351(3),3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 23rd March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRJE010023202026
e-Filing Number
10-03-2026
Filing Number
2073/2026
Filing Date
10-03-2026
Registration No
407/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Court
Jehanabad DJ Div
Judge
1-District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
FIR Details
FIR Number
68
Police Station
KAKO
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Raushan Kumar
Adv. Rajesh Kumar
Nitu Kumari
Adv. Rajesh Kumar
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Sessions Court, Jehanabad rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Raushan Kumar and Nitu Kumari, who were accused of assault, theft, and other offences under the IPC. The court found that the petitioners were named in the FIR with substantive allegations of active participation in the alleged incident, supported by the injured person's statement, medical evidence of grievous injury, and witness corroboration, making them unsuitable for anticipatory bail at this stage of investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Sessions Court, Jehanabad rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Raushan Kumar and Nitu Kumari, who were accused of assault, theft, and other offences under the IPC. The court found that the petitioners were named in the FIR with substantive allegations of active participation in the alleged incident, supported by the injured person's statement, medical evidence of grievous injury, and witness corroboration, making them unsuitable for anticipatory bail at this stage of investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts