Vinay Yadav vs State of Bihar — 360/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),109(1),303(2),352,351(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRJE010019542026

Filing Number

1750/2026

Filing Date

24-Feb-2026

Registration No

360/2026

Registration Date

24-Feb-2026

Court

Jehanabad DJ Div

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 17-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

32

Police Station

PARAS BIGHA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),109(1),303(2),352,351(2),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Vinay Yadav

    Adv. Amar Nath Kumar Chaudhari

  2. 2.Surendra Yadav

  3. 3.Manti Devi

  4. 4.Ranju Devi

  5. 5.Khusboo Devi

  6. 6.Rubi Devi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The Sessions Judge, Jehanabad granted anticipatory bail to five accused (Surendra Yadav, Manti Devi, Ranju Devi, Khushboo Devi, and Rubi Devi) in a case involving alleged assault and theft. The court found that the injuries sustained were simple, the theft allegation was unsupported by witness statements, and the dispute originated from a family land dispute with a pending compromise petition. The accused were released on bail bonds of Rs. 15,000 each with two sureties of equal amount, subject to conditions under section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 24-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 360/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Sessions Judge, Jehanabad granted anticipatory bail to five accused (Surendra Yadav, Manti Devi, Ranju Devi, Khushboo Devi, and Rubi Devi) in a case involving alleged assault and theft. The court found that the injuries sustained were simple, the theft allegation was unsupported by witness statements, and the dispute originated from a family land dispute with a pending compromise petition. The accused were released on bail bonds of Rs. 15,000 each with two sureties of equal amount, subject to conditions under section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case