MAHESH MAHTO vs State of Bihar — 348/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),190,126(2),115(2),109,74,303(2),352. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED FOR NON-PROSECUTION on 11th June 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRJE010019082026
e-Filing Number
23-02-2026
Filing Number
1707/2026
Filing Date
23-Feb-2026
Registration No
348/2026
Registration Date
23-Feb-2026
Court
Jehanabad DJ Div
Judge
4-Addl. District and Sessions Judge-II
Decision Date
11-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED FOR NON-PROSECUTION
Last updated 16-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
125
Police Station
GHOSI
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MAHESH MAHTO
Adv. Amresh Kumar
-
2.BIRNATH MAHTO
Adv. Amresh Kumar
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Jun-2026
OrderView PDF
The Additional Sessions Judge II, Jehanabad dismissed the anticipatory bail petition filed by Mahesh Mahto and others in Case 348/2026 (Ghoshi P.S Case No. 125/2025) as not pressed. Despite repeated calls on 11.06.2026, no representative of the petitioners appeared to argue the petition, while the Assistant Public Prosecutor was present. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Jun-2026
Disposed
Addl. District and Sessions Judge-II
-
05-Jun-2026
Hearing
Addl. District and Sessions Judge-II
-
26-May-2026
Hearing
Addl. District and Sessions Judge-II
-
18-May-2026
Hearing
Addl. District and Sessions Judge-II
-
02-May-2026
Hearing
Addl. District and Sessions Judge-II
-
15-Apr-2026
Hearing
Addl. District and Sessions Judge-II
-
30-Mar-2026
Hearing
Addl. District and Sessions Judge-II
-
17-Mar-2026
Hearing
Addl. District and Sessions Judge-II
-
25-Feb-2026
Hearing
Addl. District and Sessions Judge-II
-
24-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 348/2026
The Additional Sessions Judge II, Jehanabad dismissed the anticipatory bail petition filed by Mahesh Mahto and others in Case 348/2026 (Ghoshi P.S Case No. 125/2025) as not pressed. Despite repeated calls on 11.06.2026, no representative of the petitioners appeared to argue the petition, while the Assistant Public Prosecutor was present. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts